top of page

Blog

student walking through empty university campus

Most of the UK universities are increasingly reassessing their international recruitment strategies following the introduction of stricter Basic Compliance Assessment (BCA) rules by UKVI. In response to heightened scrutiny around visa refusal rates, enrolment outcomes, and overall sponsor risk, some institutions have taken the difficult but strategic decision to pause or cease recruitment from certain high-risk markets.

This shift is not about reducing international recruitment, but about protecting sponsor licence integrity and ensuring long-term sustainability. With compliance metrics now playing a more decisive role in institutional risk profiles, universities are required to adopt to more data-driven and risk-based approaches to recruitment, admissions decision-making, and CAS issuance.


The current landscape highlights the growing importance of robust risk management frameworks, cross-functional collaboration between recruitment, admissions and compliance teams, and a clear and calculated institutional risk appetite.


Institutions that invest early in strong compliance controls and proactive monitoring are better positioned to navigate this change while continuing to recruit responsibly and ethically.


As the regulatory environment continues to evolve, strategic compliance is no longer a back-office function, it is central to institutional resilience and international strategy.


 

immigration, university, uk, london

Last year, the UK Government published the Immigration White Paper “Restoring Control Over the Immigration System” (May 2025), signalling a clear policy direction towards tighter controls and reduced net migration. That direction is now being formally embedded through the Statement of Changes (HC 1333), with most measures taking effect from 11 November 2025, giving legal force to many of the proposals outlined in the White Paper.

For UK Higher Education Institutions, these immigration rule changes represent a further tightening of the education-migration framework and a clear reminder that compliance metrics and sponsor performance are under increased scrutiny.


Key changes impacting international students and sponsors include:

Student Route – Updated Financial Requirements

  • £1,529 per month for study in London (up to 9 months), increased from £1,438

  • £1,171 per month for study outside London (up to 9 months), increased from £1,136

Child Student Route – Guardianship and Care Arrangements

  • Amendments provide clarity following ambiguities created by transitional rules introduced in May 2025.

Graduate Route – Reduced Post-Study Leave

  • As signalled in the White Paper, the Graduate route will reduce from 2 years to 18 months for most applicants applying on or after 1 January 2027.

  • PhD graduates will continue to receive 3 years of leave.

Basic Compliance Assessment (BCA) – New Metrics

  • Visa refusal rate reduced to 5% (previously 10%)

  • Enrolment rate increased to 95% (previously 90%)

  • Course completion rate increased to 90% (previously 85%)


What this means for institutions/student sponsors?

These changes reinforce the shift towards a risk-based, data-driven compliance environment. Recruitment strategies, admissions decision-making, CAS issuance, and ongoing student engagement must now be even more closely aligned with institutional risk appetite and sponsor licence protection.

Compliance is no longer reactive—it is strategic. Institutions that invest in robust monitoring systems, cross-functional collaboration, and early risk intervention will be best placed to remain compliant while continuing to recruit responsibly and sustainably.

 

student at university

The UK Government’s latest Immigration White Paper signals a major shift for the higher education sector, and for those of us working in sponsor compliance, the message is clear: the bar is about to get higher and BCA metrics are tightening.


From September 2025, universities sponsoring international students will face stricter Basic Compliance Assessment (BCA) thresholds:

· Visa refusal rates cut from 10% to 5%

· Enrolment rates raised from 90% to 95%

· Course completion rates raised from 85% to 90%

Alongside this, a new “Red-Amber-Green” rating system will make sponsor performance more visible than ever.


On paper, these reforms aim to drive quality and accountability. In practice, they present real challenges:

22 UK universities would have failed these thresholds if applied last year.

Around 49,000 international students could have been directly affected.

For higher education institutions, this isn’t just about compliance — it’s about sustainability, reputation, and competitiveness in a global education market.


What should universities be doing now?

Create a robust system of compliance and Audit your sponsor performance against the proposed thresholds to identify risk areas.

Review recruitment markets, practices and strengthen oversight of international agents.

Invest in student support - from pre-arrival induction to engagement and retention - to improve completion outcomes.

Diversify your student pipeline to spread risk and avoid over-reliance on high-refusal regions.

 

Having worked in visa and immigration compliance within UK higher education for over 20 years, our view is this:

· The White Paper is not just a compliance challenge, it’s a strategic one.

· Those who prepare early and embed robust, effective and proactive compliance into their applicant and student journey will be better placed to navigate these changes.

· Those who don’t risk financial strain, reputational damage, and potential loss of sponsor status.


The UK must remain a competitive and attractive study destination. But for that to happen, universities need to get ahead of these reforms now.

Pop and Brown has over 20 years of experience in providing compliance without compromise and has helped both publicly funded and private HEIs safeguard their sponsor license. You can reach out to us to discuss how we can support your institution.

 
bottom of page